Should the Palestinian Authority continue to receive foreign aid after Hamas' 2006 electoral victory?
General Reference (not clearly pro or con)
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), in a Feb. 2, 2006 report titled "U.S. Aid to the Palestinians," provided the following:
"With the recent success of Hamas at the polls, many
observers have cautioned that continued foreign assistance to the
Palestinian Authority (PA) may be at risk due to Hamas’ commitment to
the destruction of the state of Israel and its designation as a
terrorist group by the United States. Currently, the Palestinians are
the largest per capita recipients of foreign aid worldwide and, with a
shattered economy, are completely dependent on external support to meet
basic needs.
Without Western aid, a Hamas-led government may be forced
to rely completely on donations from wealthy Arab Gulf states or from
Iran. On the other hand, the prospect of losing U.S. and European aid
may force Hamas to tone down its radical views and accept Israel’s right
to exist. In the meantime, foreign donors have been cautious, demanding
that Hamas renounce the use of violence and recognize Israel while
withholding a complete cessation of aid programs pending the formation
of a new Palestinian government."
Should the Palestinian Authority continue to receive foreign aid after Hamas' 2006 electoral victory?
PRO (yes)
CON (no)
Alvaro de Soto, MA, United Nations Middle East Envoy to the Quartet to the Middle East, in a Mar. 24, 2006 Associated Press article titled "U.N. Mideast Envoy Warns of Potentially Dangerous Deterioration in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict," stated:
"These are monies that belong to the
Palestinians and should not be withheld... It follows that the
formation of a new government and the approval of its program
should be awaited and that actions prior to that would be
premature.
Nearly one million Palestinians rely on a
Palestinian Authority wage earner, and Palestinian Authority
salaries account for about 25 percent of GDP. The fiscal crisis
could therefore lead to rising unemployment and soaring poverty
rates... [the Authority] may not be able to deliver the basic
services to sustain Palestinians and stave off a humanitarian
crisis: healthcare, sanitation, and maintenance of sewage,
electricity and water networks.
The United Nations and voluntary organizations cannot fill the void
that would be created were the Palestinian Authority no longer able to
provide the vital services that it delivers now. The United Nations
will continue to work with all concerned to try to find ways to ensure
that the needs of the Palestinians are met."
Gholam Ali Haddad-Adel, PhD, MS, Speaker of the Majlis (legislative body) of Iran, in a Apr. 16, 2006 interview at the "International Conference on Holy Qods and Support For the Rights of Palestinian People," referenced by the British Broadcast Company (BBC), commented:
"The way through which the financial aid is
channelled to the people of Palestine is not important... What is
important is that no pressures should be exerted on the
Palestinian nation... It is natural that Hamas expects all of us
to offer financial aid... And it is also natural that when others
halt their financial assistance we should help them... Supporting
Palestinians should not be limited to financial aid, but political
assistance should also be extended to them... Israel and the US
must feel that there is an all-out support for the cause of
Palestine."
The Tampa Tribune, a daily newspaper in Florida, in a May 23, 2006 editorial titled "Stopping All Aid To Palestine Starves Hamas But Feeds Hatred," commented:
"Only those blind to reality think that
withholding all aid to Palestine will force the Hamas-led
government there to renounce violence and acknowledge Israel's
right to exist... To starve the terrorists also starves their
children and other innocents caught up in the complex struggle...
Hamas, while getting aid smuggled in from supporters in
Iran, Sudan and other anti-American areas, already is making a
propaganda victory out of the widespread suffering brought on by a
U.S.-led embargo. Hamas calls the American withdrawal of aid an
attack on democracy, a message that resonates in other Arab
countries...
Those nearest the problem, including most
Israelis, understand that cutting off aid to a terror-tainted
territory won't have the same effect as cutting off the allowance
to a misbehaving child. The last to feel hunger pains would be the
strong young gunmen of Hamas...
By targeting aid to those most in need, the United States makes a
humanitarian statement that resonates deeper than the rants of the
shirtless mob marching down a dead-end
street."
The US House of Representatives (109th U.S. Congress), in the House Resolution 4681 introduced on Feb. 1, 2006, "Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006," recommended:
"...It is the sense of Congress that... the
territory controlled by the Palestinian Authority should be deemed
to be in use as a sanctuary for terrorists or terrorist
organizations.
...It shall be the policy of the United
States that the United States Executive Director at each
international financial institution shall use the voice, vote, and
influence of the United States to prohibit assistance to the
Palestinian Authority.
...The Secretary of State should
withhold from United States contributions to the regular assessed
budget of the United Nations... expended by any United Nations
affiliated or specialized agency for assistance directly to the
Palestinian Authority.
...The Secretary of State shall
withhold from United States contributions to the voluntary budget
of the United Nations... expended by any United Nations affiliated
or specialized agency for assistance directly to the Palestinian
Authority."
The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in a section on its website (accessed Sep. 27, 2006) titled "Cabinet Communique 21 May 2006," offered the following remarks:
"The
cabinet discussed the provision of humanitarian aid to the
Palestinian population in the form of medical assistance, and
decided... To transfer to international aid organizations... (New
Israeli Sheqel) NIS 50 million worth of medicines and medical
equipment, to be financed by the funds which it has been decided
not to transfer to the Palestinian Authority (PA), for transfer in
turn to Palestinian medical institutions.
The medicines and
equipment will be transferred after coordination with the
aforesaid medical institutions via the chosen international aid
organizations. At its 19 February 2006 meeting, the cabinet
decided that, 'Towards the conclusion of the caretaker government,
money will not be transferred from Israel to the Palestinian
Authority.'
At its 11 April 2006 meeting, the cabinet decided that... 'The
Palestinian Authority is a terrorist authority that is hostile to
Israel; the State of Israel, and all of its official representatives,
will not maintain ties with the Palestinian Authority and its
elements... Israel will coordinate with the international community
regarding humanitarian assistance for the needs of the Palestinian
population, not via the Palestinian Authority establishment'."
The United States Department of State, in an Apr. 6, 2006 press conference given by spokesman Sean McCormack stated:
"The United States is suspending assistance to the Palestinian government's cabinet and ministries. The new Palestinian government must take responsibility for the consequences of its policies. The path back to the road map is clear, acceptance of the three principles. If it accepts the Quartet principles or a new government comes to power that accepts them, funding can be restored."